Azhdarchid Paleobiology, part II
May 28, 2008
The azhdarchid problem
Virtually all pterosaurs have been suggested to be shorebird-like animals; as gull- or pelican-like predators that flew over lakes and oceans, grabbig fish from the water. Azhdarchids first became reasonable well known in the 1970s, and their distinctive anatomy immediately indicated that they were not obeying this lifestyle stereotype. However, opinions on exactly what they were doing has divided pterosaur paleontologists.
Originally described as vulture-like scavengers, azhdarchids were later suggested to be mud-probers (sticking their long bills into the ground in search of prey) and, bringing azhdarchids into line with convention, subsequent paleontologists suggested that they made a living by flying over the water’s surface, grabbing fish. Other lifestyles, including wading, and aerial or aquatic predation, have been suggested too. These lifestyles are radically divergent and, in some cases, directly conflict with each other: how can an animal be specialised for probing muddy sediments in search of food and simultaneously be specialised for grabbing prey from the water surface while flying? It can’t, that’s how. What is needed for azhdarchids is for someone to sit down and carefully examine their fossils to see which lifestyle is best supported. In our new paper, we have done just this, and we propose a revolutionary new view on azhdarchid lifestyle.
In contrast to the view that pterosaurs were tied to water-based lifestyles, we have found evidence that they were well adapted to a more terrestrial existence. In the new paper, we argue that azhdarchids were specialised terrestrial stalkers, walking – not flying – around ancient prairies and woodlands, grabbing small dinosaurs and other prey items with their elongate jaws. Azhdarchids were good at walking on the ground, had proportionally short but broad wings that allowed them to take off easily in inland habitats, and had long necks and skulls well suited for picking things up from the ground. Crucially, their feet were small and padded, making them adept at traversing solid ground, but unsuited for wading or swimming.
There are no giant, winged animals like azhdarchids today, but we may view large ground-feeding birds such as storks and ground hornbills as their closest modern analogues [a ground hornbill is shown in the image here]. The restoration at the top shows a group of azhdarchids (belonging to the species Quetzalcoatlus northropi) as they may have looked while foraging on a Cretaceous fern prairie (Quetzalcoatlus northropi lived in Texas during the Late Cretaceous). A juvenile titanosaur, a type of long-necked dinosaur, has been procured by one pterosaur, while the others stalk through the scrub in search of other small vertebrates.
This hypothesis is a world away from the conventional view that all pterosaurs hung around bodies of water, catching fish mid-flight or standing in the shallows searching for food. Rather, we suspect that azhdarchids were only part of a very diverse group of animals that were far more ecologically dynamic than convention suggests.
How did we do this research? To find out, please see part III….
Ref – –